Wednesday 11 April 2012

Page 3 tits? Why not?

Reading my twitter feed yesterday i saw a tweet saying that page 3 girls should be banned (or words to that effect), As you know i am gay so have no interest in seeing a woman get her breast out, but it is her choice.

If people want to show of their bodies for cash or even just the thrill of it in what ever media publication there is then let them. I don't care what they do ( as long as they are not forced against their will), if they strip for money then fine, Why should we stop them?

In my youth The Sun also used to run a page 7 fella, i used to like it ( also wished i would have a body like they did, the wish never come true) and think they should bring it back.

All i am saying is that we should celebrate our bodies it whatever way makes us happy ( as long as consenting adults and in privacy of own homes), and if you don't like page 3 tits or page 7 fella (if it ever comes back) then don't buy the Sun or whatever paper/magazine.

Remember we are all beautiful, so lets not be ashamed of it.

9 comments:

  1. Liarpoliticians11 April 2012 at 15:12

    The more naked female breasts on show the better. Much more interesting then looking at politicians plying their fake concent all over the place.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love tits but I prefer the juicy melons you used to get back in the day

    Captain Birdseye

    ReplyDelete
  3. Billy, you ARE a tit. That is all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As always Bill well said - very sane and sensible.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Infuriated of West Mids11 April 2012 at 21:00

    As a straight bloke, I like boobs - they're great!

    As long as a woman's genuinely happy to show them to me, I'm happy to ogle.

    I just wish the ones the press chose to show looked a bit more ... y'know ... normal.

    No problem with the old page 7 fellas, either. In fact, if they brought them back, it might encourage me to get back down the gym...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Some Geezer wot would rather see THIS kind of boob11 April 2012 at 21:24

    I am sure you can appreciate the aesthetic beauty of the female form even if it does nothing for your libido. (Botticelli's Venus-- Google-image it if you're not familiar with it.) But you are right-- if a young woman (or MAN, as in the page seven case) not under some sort of duress wants to expose herself, good on her (or him). Some people, however, think that many of these women are East European sex workers white-slaved into EU countries like the UK, Netherlands, Germany, France etc. and, just as with age restrictions, whoever publishes the pix should have some sort of registration procedure to make sure none of the women are being exploited. Is this a possible solution? A lot to think about, Billy!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I do know a gay man who finds breasts absolutely horrifying. If you brandish a page 3 photo in front of him, he recoils, wincing with real pain. I think I can understand how he feels, after he insisted on showing me a web site called something like Guys with Extremely Large Testicles. Chacun a son joujou.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I will say as a long-time visitor of FKK sites in Croatia that the ability to see everyone in the nude; old - young, male - female; good looking or grotesquely ugly; has an interestingly normalising effect on one's sexual urge as it demythesises the rather curious and prurient attitude that the British have taken some two centuries to develop. I still look at women who catch my fancy as I would if they had clothes on. So it does not neuter one's feelings of attraction rather than place them in a context that becomes easier to cope with.

    I have had some interesting, non-flirtatious, conversations with women where I have thought afterwards How could I have been talking about say architecture to a stunningly fit woman that I otherwise might have looked at in the street and though only sexual thoughts about? But the fact is that I did have a pleasant interaction in that place that would probably have been totally misconstrued out in the street. And of course, I talk to men and women alike who are perhaps less attractive visually but interesting conversationally.

    ReplyDelete