"As a legal construct, fraud is both a civil wrong (i.e., a fraud victim may sue the fraud perpetrator to avoid the fraud and/or recover monetary compensation) and a criminal wrong (i.e., a fraud perpetrator may be prosecuted and imprisoned by governmental authorities). Defrauding people or organizations of money or valuables is the usual purpose of fraud, but it sometimes instead involves obtaining benefits without actually depriving anyone of money or valuables, such as obtaining a drivers license by way of false statements made in an application for the same"
Now here is a tweet by a Labour Lord (and whip )
Labours Bns Sherlock nailed It when she described Univetsal Jobsmatch site as useless & full of non existent 'Ghost Jobs'. #FreudFraud
— Steve Bassam (@SteveTheQuip) March 12, 2014
The cricketing Lord implies that Freud is a fraud, therefore he should put forward evidence of the crime (civil or criminal) or withdraw the allegation.
Maybe the 3rd umpire (or in this case the SFO serious fraud office) should have a look.